Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; petitioner repeatedly absent and unrepresented despite pass over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-26166-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-26166-2017 (O&M) Date of order: 26.09.2024 Parveen Kumar ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & another …Respondent (s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:None for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Aman Nain, Advocate for respondent no.2. ***
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
On 2.5.2023, 5.9.2023 and 15.12.2023, the petitioner was absent. Even
today, the petitioner is unrepresented despite pass over.
Given above, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| September 26, 2024 | |
| AK | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes |
| Whether reportable | : No |
ASHWANI KUMAR 2024.09.27 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
1
Parveen Kumar
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
