Petition seeking quashing of an FIR was withdrawn by counsel as the petitioner had filed a fresh petition on his own; pleadings were attached to the new petition and the matter disposed of.
Pleadings (reply, rejoinder) attached to CRM-M-42811-2024; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
271 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.25115 of 2024(O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.09.2024
Harjinder Singh Through his Power of Attorney Beant Singh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Another … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab (Through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 71 | 25.06.2022 | Sadar Kapurthala, |
505(2), 189, 186, 211, 506, 294 IPC, |
| District Kapurthala | 1860 and 63, 49 of Punjab Police Act and | ||
| 67 of IT Act |
Seeking quashing of FIR captioned above, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
06.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.10 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Harjinder Singh Through his Power of Attorney Beant Singh
State of Punjab
Another
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
