Petitioner sought transfer of FIR investigation to another district. Investigation had concluded with a closure report; the Court held he may file a protest petition before the concerned court, raising why police filed it without deciding his representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
266
CRM-M-28664-2024 Date of Decision: 05.09.2024
Vijender ......... Pe��oner Versus
State of Haryana and others ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Vikas Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Tanya, Advocate for the pe��oner. Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate for respondents No. 5, 6, 7 and 9. Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.8.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta0on | Sec0ons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 18.01.2024 | Sadar Tohana, |
294, 34, | 506 IPC and 3 of |
| District Fatehabad | Schedule | Caste and Schedule | ||
| Tribe | (Preven�on of |
|||
| Atroci�es | )Act,1989 |
Seeking transfer of the inves�ga�on of the FIR cap�oned above in other
District, the pe��oner has come up before this Court.
men�oned that not only closure report is filed but they are also contempla�ng to move
JYOTI 2024.09.06 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRM-M-28664-2024
-2-
against the pe��oner under Sec�on 182 IPC. He further submits that they hushed up the ma<er and did not even decide the representa�on made by the pe��oner.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
05.09.2024 Jyo�-II
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
JYOTI 2024.09.06 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the investigation of the FIR should be transferred to another district.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijender
State of Haryana and others
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
