Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition; counsel stated at the outset that he wished to withdraw, and the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any issue on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-21860-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-6.11.2024
Sarabjit Singh (Sarabjit Singh) @ Sam Sandhu … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6.11.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.11.06 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Sarabjit Singh @ Sam Sandhu
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
