The applicant sought special leave to appeal an acquittal in a matrimonial dispute. Since all disputes were settled and the parties resided together, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the application, which was granted.
Withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous application was permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
217 CRM-A1632-MA-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.08.2024
Raj Bala
.… Applicant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar and others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Anil K. Sokal, Advocate for Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for the respondents.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
By way of filing the present criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks special leave to file appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 16.08.2013, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar, acquitting respondents No. 1 to 6 in a private criminal complaint filed by the applicant under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC.
On the last date of hearing i.e. 16.08.2023, learned counsel for the respondents had submitted that all disputes between the parties have been settled and the applicant is now residing with respondent No. 1.
Learned counsel for the applicant has not disputed the abovesaid facts noticed in the previous order dated 16.08.2023.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant criminal miscellaneous application.
Ordered accordingly.
06.08.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.08.09 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Bala
Sanjeev Kumar
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
