The petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition after the Court expressed inability to grant the relief. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[202-2] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
CRM-M- 1 6086-2024 Date of D ecision : 10.05.2024
Nanaki K aur …Petitioner
versus
State of H aryana and another ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present : Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.). Mr. S.K. Dagar, DAG, Hary a na.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
[1] After arguing for some time , when this Court is not incline d to agree w ith the prayer made on behalf o f the petitioner, learned couns e l
prays for withdrawal of the instant petitio n .
[2] Dismissed as withdrawn.
( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE
10.05.20 2 4
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.05.10 05:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nanaki Kaur
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
