Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of an order enhancing interim maintenance from Rs.3000 to Rs.6000 per month. Counsel for the petitioner sought withdrawal as the parties had compromised the matter; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
228 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10418-2021 Date of order: 09.05.2024
Ajay Kumar …..Petitioner
Versus
State of Hary a na and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present : M r. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for t h e petitioner. M r. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Har y ana. M r. J.C. Malik, Advocate for res p ondents No.2 & 3.
P r ayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC is for quashing of o rder dated 13.08.2019 (Ann e xure P/6) passed by the lear n ed Sessions Judge, Panipat whereby the amoun t of interim maintenance has been enhanced fro m Rs.3000/- per month to Rs.6000/- per month.
L e arned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withd r aw the present p e tition as the matter has been compromised between the par t ies. T h e same is not opposed to by l e arned counsel for the responde n ts. A ccordingly, in view of the sta t ement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as w ithdrawn.
(Nidhi Gupta) Judge
09.05.2024
‘Amit’
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
AMIT KHANCHI 2024.05.10 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar
State of Haryana
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
