Disposed

Karan Sahota v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC10 May 2024CRM-M/12780/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought quashing of FIR under Sections 498-A, 420 and 406 IPC. A status report showed the investigation had resulted in a cancellation report pending approval by senior police officers. The petitioner submitted the petition had been rendered infructuous and the Court disposed of it accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as infructuous in view of the pending cancellation report.

Karan Sahota Vs State of Punjab and Another — Dowry and Cruelty | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M-12780-2024

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

114

¶5

Criminal Misc. No. M-12780 of 2024 Date of decision :-10.05.2024

Karan Sahota

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

¶10

…..Respondents

¶11

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶12

Present:Mr. Preetinder S. Ahluwalia , Advocate with Ms. Bhavi Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG , Punjab.

¶14

Mr. Jasdev Singh Mehndirat t a, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶15

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶16

Prayer in this petition is f o r quashing of FIR No.100 dated 10. 0 5.2022 (Annexure P-1), under S ections 498-A, 420 and 406 IPC, reg i stered at Police Station Tan d a, District Hoshiarpur, on merits .

¶17

Status report dated 09.05.2024 by way of affidavit of Harjit Si n gh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub-Division Tanda, District H oshiarpur has been filed in th e Court today. The same is taken on r ecord. Copy thereof supplied t o the counsel opposite. In para 6 of the said status r eport, it has been stated that after du e investigation the SHO, Pol i ce Station Tanda, District Hoshiarp u r has prepared the cancellatio n report in this case and the

¶18

VIJAY ASIJA 2024.05.13 14.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-12780-2024

¶20

¶21

said cancellation report has been sent to the senior police officer for approval, where it is still pending.

¶22

Learned counsel for the S t ate submits that all efforts would be made to pursue this expeditiously.

¶23

Learned counsel for the peti t ioner submits that in view of the abov e said averments made in the st a tus report dated 09.05.2024, the prese n t petition has been rendered i n fructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.

¶24

Ordered accordingly.

¶25

Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.

¶26

May 10, 2 024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE

¶27

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶28

VIJAY ASIJA 2024.05.13 14.12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Karan Sahota v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Sahota v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmal Singh Vs Sunita Rani and Ors.

Vikas and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Ajay Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Indu Chadha Vs State of Ut Chd and Ors.

Rana Vs State of Punjab and Others

Nanaki Kaur Vs State of Haryana and Anr.