Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh after recording the complainant's evidence; counsel withdrew it and the court dismissed it as withdrawn with that liberty.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after recording of complainant's evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-15376-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.12.2024
Mohan Bhandari … Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate with Mr. Deepak Nagar, Advocate, Mr. Anuj Sehrawat, Advocate, Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh after recording of complainant’s evidence.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
10.12.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.12 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Mohan Bhandari
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
