The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the main criminal miscellaneous petition. The Court, finding specific reasons for withdrawal in the application, allowed the prayer and dismissed the main case as withdrawn.
Main case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-12393-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.12.2024
Harwinder Kaur and another … Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Narinder Singh Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
CRM-49149-2024
By way of filing the instant application, the applicant/petitioners seek permission to withdraw the main case, which is presently fixed for 23.4.2025.
In view of the specific prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant/petitioners for withdrawal of the main case and in view of the reasons mentioned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the main case i.e. CRM-M-12393-2023 , which is presently fixed for 23.4.2025 is preponed and is taken on board today and the main case itself is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
16.12.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.16 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Harwinder Kaur and another
State of Punjab and another
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
