Petitioners stated the matter had been amicably resolved and sought permission to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-15259-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.12.2024
M/s Tarun Enterprises and another
… Petitioners
Versus
Joginderpal Singh ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Aharjot Grewal, Advocate for Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, for the petitioners.
None for the respondent.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel representing the petitioners submitted that the matter has been amicably resolved amongst the parties and, as such, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
13.12.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.13 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
M/s Tarun Enterprises
Joginderpal Singh
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
