Revision petition against proceedings in a civil suit; the suit was dismissed on withdrawal during pendency, rendering the revision infructuous. Petitioners did not appear; the Court disposed of the revision accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
297
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.989 of 2023 Date of Decision: 22.05.2024
Baljinder Singh and others
…..Revisionists-Petitioners.
Versus
Maninder Singh
.....Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:None for the revisionists-petitioners.
Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
Despite the present matter having been taken up twice since morning, none has put in appearance in the Court to represent the petitioners. 2. At this stage, the Court Master, attached to this Court, has checked the current status of the Civil Suit No.643 of 2015 , out of which the instant revision-petition has arisen, on the relevant Portal and he informs the Court that the above-referred Civil Suit has already been dismissed by the concerned trial Court on 14.05.2024 for its having been withdrawn and he has taken out the print of the afore-said order and the same has been placed on the file.
| (MEEN | AKSHI I. MEHTA) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | JUDGE | ||
| Yag Dutt | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned: | Yes | ||
| Whether Reportable: | No |
YAG DUTT 2024.05.23 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Baljinder Singh and others
Maninder Singh
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
