The revision petition was withdrawn by the petitioners after the parties settled their dispute amicably. The High Court dismissed the petition on this basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
302
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.6581 of 2023 Date of Decision: 22.05.2024
M/s Maxban Finance Pvt. Ltd. and others
…..Revisionists-Petitioners. Versus
Sarabhjit Singh Grewal and others
.....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. Kamaldeep S. Sidhu, Advocate for the revisionists-petitioners.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw
the instant revision-petition, while submitting that the parties have already settled their dispute amicably.
having been withdrawn.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 22, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
YAG DUTT 2024.05.22 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
M/s Maxban Finance Pvt. Ltd. and others
Sarabhjit Singh Grewal and others
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
