The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of a revision petition as infructuous because the underlying civil suit was decided earlier. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
276
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.5725 of 2019 Date of Decision: 22.05.2024
Harsanjam Kaur
…..Revisionist-Petitioner.
Versus
Jagtar Singh and others
.....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. Mahipal S. Yadav, Advocate, appearing for Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.
Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for respondent No.1.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as per the instructions from the arguing counsel, informs the Court that the instant revision-petition has become infructuous as the Civil Suit, out of which it had arisen, has already been decided by the concerned trial Court vide the judgment passed on 19.01.2024 and he prays that this revision-petition be disposed of accordingly.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 22, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
YAG DUTT 2024.05.22 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Harsanjam Kaur
Jagtar Singh
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
