Revision petition challenging trial court proceedings in a suit including rendition of accounts. After respondent's application to abandon that relief was allowed, petitioners did not press the revision; the High Court dismissed it as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:028403
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125 CR No.89 of 2024 Date of Decision : 28.02.2024
Mohinder Singh Brar and Another ....Petitioners
VERSUS
Darshanjot Kaur Brar and Another ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Arshdeep Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. A.S. Narang, Advocate for respondent No.1
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
had been filed before the Trial Court for abandoning the suit qua the relief of rendition of accounts and the same has been allowed.
that he does not wish to press the present revision petition in view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.1.
( ALKA SARIN ) 28.02.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.02.29 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
Mohinder Singh Brar
Darshanjot Kaur Brar
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
