Revision petition dismissed as having been rendered infructuous on the statement of the petitioner's counsel; pending applications, if any, disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:027498
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
127 CR-977-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.02.2024
Manu Kaushal @ Neeraj Kaushal ... Petitioner(s) Versus Ridhima Rampal and another ...Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Atul Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
27.02.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.02.27 22:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manu Kaushal @ Neeraj Kaushal
Ridhima Rampal
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
