Petition challenged an order allowing maintenance under Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Counsel stated the main matrimonial case stood decreed ex parte, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:028277 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
240 CR-3980-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.02.2024
Rajpreet Kaur and Another ... Petitioner(s) Versus Jaspreet Singh ...Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Anil K. Sokal, Advocate for Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate for the petitioners.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
28.02.2024 Ankur
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.02.29 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajpreet Kaur and Another
Jaspreet Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
