A civil revision petition that the parties' counsel stated had been rendered infructuous; the High Court dismissed it as infructuous and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
267-2
CR-7698-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.12.2024
DARSHAN KAUR ... PETITIONER(s)
VERSUS
VINOD KUMAR AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Tarunveer Vashist, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Service of respondent No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 30.11.2018.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
petition has since been rendered infructuous.
18.12.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.12.19 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Darshan Kaur
Vinod Kumar
Anr.
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
