Revision petition withdrawn by the petitioner at the oral hearing; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
118
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.7187 of 2023 Date of Decision: 15.05.2024
Vikramjit Singh
…..Revisionist-Petitioner.
Versus
Baljit Kaur
.....Respondent.
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. D.S. Nigha, Advocate for the revisionist-petitioner.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the instant revision-petition.
having been withdrawn.
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 15, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
YAG DUTT 2024.05.15 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Vikramjit Singh
Baljit Kaur
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
