Petitioners sought to withdraw a revision petition regarding the appointment of a receiver by the trial court. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the revision petition accordingly.
Revision petition dismissed for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
129
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.2938 of 2024 Date of Decision: 14.05.2024
Harbans Singh @ Bansa and others
…Revisionists-Petitioners
Versus
Gagandeep Kaur and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:Mr. Bhupinder Banga, Advocate for the revisionists-petitioners.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J . (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant revision-petition, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to avail the appropriate and efficacious remedy, as may be permissible to them under law, to lay challenge to the order (Annexure P-3) passed by learned trial Court on 20.12.2023 regarding the appointment of Receiver, before the Competent Court.
Resultantly, the revision-petition in hand stands dismissed for
having been withdrawn accordingly.
14.05.2024 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No
NEETU RANI 2024.05.14 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD
Harbans Singh @ Bansa and others
Gagandeep Kaur and others
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
