Vinay Kumar v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution as no representation appeared for the petitioner.
Petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution as no representation appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-12029 of 2022 Date of Decision:11.09.2024 Vinay Kumar .....Pe--oner Vs. State of Haryana .....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the pe��oner.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. AG, Haryana. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the pe��oner.
Dismissed in default for non-prosecu�on.
September 11, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.09.11 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Vinay Kumar
State of Haryana
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court