Jatinder Kumar v. Vaneeta Rani and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed as rendered infructuous on the statement of respondents' counsel, with liberty to revive if anything survives. Pending applications disposed of.
Revision petition dismissed as rendered infructuous on the statement of respondents' counsel, with liberty to revive if anything survives. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
327-1
CR-4811-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.11.2024
Jatinder Kumar
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Vanita Rani and Another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN ) 12.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.13 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Jatinder Kumar
Vanita Rani
Another
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court