Petitioner repeatedly failed to appear when the revision petition was called, including twice on the date of hearing. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
236
CR-358-2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.11.2024 RAMESH KUMAR ... PETITIONER (s) VERSUS ISHWAR SINGH ...RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Maurya, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Arora, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
12.11.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.11.13 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ramesh Kumar
Ishwar Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
