A revision petition that had become infructuous was dismissed by consent of the petitioner's counsel; pending applications were also disposed of. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
327
CR-3787-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 12.11.2024
Vanita Rani and Another
....Petitioners
VERSUS
Jatinder Kumar
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioners.
None for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN )
12.11.2024 jk
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.13 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Vanita Rani
Another
Jatinder Kumar
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
