Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on two consecutive hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:163219
[151] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4709-2023 Date of Decision : 09.12.2024
Panchayat Roran and Kamboan Mohalla …Petitioner
versus
Ashok Kumar ….Respondent
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] No one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing i.e. 13.11.2024. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present revision petition.
[2] Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
09.12.2024 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.12.09 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Panchayat Roran and Kamboan Mohalla
Ashok Kumar
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
