A civil revision petition arising from a rent matter was dismissed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the main case had already been decided by the Rent Controller.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
136 CR-2119-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.11.2024
JOGINDER PAL .... Petitioner
VERSUS
SURESH AGGARWAL AND ANR .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Rahul Kumar Prashar, Advocate for Mr. B.B.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
26.11.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2024.11.27 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Joginder Pal
Suresh Aggarwal
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
