The revision petition was dismissed as rendered infructuous. No substantive legal proposition is established in this order as it merely followed the procedure of disposal without reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
277
CR-4914-2015 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.11.2024 PARMINDER SINGH SANDHU ... PETITIONER(s) VERSUS INDERPAL SINGH RANDHAWA ...RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
25.11.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Ankur JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.11.26 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parminder Singh Sandhu
Inderpal Singh Randhawa
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
