The High Court dismissed the revision petition as infructuous since possession of the shop was delivered to the petitioner, reserving remedies for rent arrears.
None; possession already delivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
274
CR-7228-2014 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.11.2024
NIRMALA DEVI & ANR ... PETITIONER(s) VERSUS BALWANT KUMAR ...RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Vijay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Saini, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
of the shop in question has already been delivered, however, there are arrears of rent due towards the petitioner.
seek his remedies as available in law qua recovery of arrears of rent.
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.11.26 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nirmala Devi & Anr
Balwant Kumar
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
