The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's counsel's failure to furnish the respondent's correct address despite multiple opportunities and a prior direction to do so under pain of dismissal, in RSA No. 4432 of 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:069998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 4432 of 2019 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.5.2023 ... Naib Singh ................Appellant vs. Jarnail Singh .................Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: Mr. Amit Rana, Advocate for
Mr. G.S. Nahel, Advocate for the appellant.
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Correct latest address of respondent not furnished despite grant of several opportunities to counsel for the appellant to do so. Vide order dated 5.12.2022, it was directed that correct address of respondent be furnished by the next date of hearing fixed as 12.1.2023 and in case of default, the appeal shall be liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. It was not so done. On 12.1.2023 in view of explanation rendered by counsel for the appellant, one more opportunity was granted to him to furnish correct address of the respondent by the next date of hearing fixed as 31.3.2023.
The case has been put up today. The needful has not been done by counsel for the appellant. There is no justification for adjourning the case further.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( H.S. Madaan ) 15.5.2023 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2023.05.16 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Naib Singh
Jarnail Singh
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
