The High Court dismissed an appeal for enhancement of compensation in a motor accident case that was not prosecuted because the appellant could not be found at the given address, granting three months for seeking recall.
Order sent to appellant's last known address and local SHO; three months period granted to seek recalling of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:146775
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
242 FAO-1206-1989 Date of Decision: 20.11.2023
Joginder Singh …Appellant
VS
Ganpat Rai and others …Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. K.S. Cheema, Advocate for respondent No.2.
None for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (ORAL)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 20.11.2023 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
HAMANT 2023.11.21 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution and what steps are required for intimating the appellant.
Joginder Singh
Ganpat Rai and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
