Appeal in a suit for possession dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants offered no representation. Court granted 3 months to seek recalling of the order.
Three months granted for seeking recalling of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:146365 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
202-b
RSA-2051-1989
Date of decision:17.11.2023
Rupinder Singh and another
....Appellants
Versus
Karnail Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None.
AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
2 . As per office report, appellants have been served. However, there is no representation on their behalf.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
17.11.2023 Ankur
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Ankur Goyal 2023.11.20 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Rupinder Singh
Karnail Singh
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
