COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Writ petition allowed based on the submission that the petitioner withdraws the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
226
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19000 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.01.2023
ATTAR SINGH
Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
......Petitioner
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present:Mr. R.K. Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for both the parties are ad idem that in case of similarly situated employee principle of 'no work no pay' has been upheld by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.1653 of 2018 decided on 14.10.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of aforesaid, this writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) January 11 , 2023 JUDGE Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
MOHMED ATIK 2023.01.12 10:54 I attest to the authenticity and integrity of this order/judgment
ATTAR SINGH
STATE OF HARYANA
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
