Petitioner sought to withdraw a petition instituted in High Court without approaching Sessions Court at first instance, requesting liberty to do so later.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Court of Sessions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
101
CRM-M No.1138 of 2023 Date of decision: 10.01.2023
SUNDER SHAM ARORA ...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vinod Ghai, Advocate General, Punjab with Mr. Aman Pal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court without filing any petition before the Court of Sessions at the first instance.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner
wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Court of Sessions.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
10.01.2023 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) P.Bhatt JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.11 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
SUNDER SHAM ARORA
STATE OF PUNJAB
RAJ MOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
