Disposed

Talvir Singh v. the State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Jan 2023CWP/298/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed the State Transport Commissioner to note pending legal notices and decide the petitioner's application for a Stage Carriage route permit within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to note pending legal notices and pass an appropriate order within one month.

Talvir Singh Vs the State Transport… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

133

¶3

CWP No.298 of 2023 Date of decision: 09.01.2023

TALVIR SINGH

...Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

¶10

Present: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

¶12

RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)

¶13

Petitioner has preferred this writ petition for the issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application filed by the petitioner on 17.02.2020 for grant of Stage Carriage route permit in terms of Clause 3-E of the New Transport Scheme of 2018 read with Chapter V of the Motor Vehilces Act on the route Sherpur to Sangrur.

¶14

Grievance of the petitioner is that despite the application dated 17.02.2020 followed by the legal notices dated 07.11.2020 and 12.12.2022, the needful in the context of grant of Stage Carriage permit on the aforesaid specified route has

¶15

not been done so far.

¶16

POONAM BHATT 2023.01.09 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

¶17

-2-

¶18

CWP No.298 of 2023

¶19

At this learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case his legal notices dated 07.11.2020 and 12.12.2022 are ordered to be decided by the Competent Authority in accordance with law.

¶20

Notice of motion.

¶21

On the asking of the Court, Mr. R.S. Pandher, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶22

In view of the nature of prayer made by the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to take note of pending legal notices dated 07.11.2020 and 12.12.2022 and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶23

09.01.2023 P.Bhatt

¶24

(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE

¶25

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶26

POONAM BHATT 2023.01.09 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

Talvir Singh v. the State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Talvir Singh v. the State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satinder Pal Singh Vs the State Transport Commissioner Punjab and Another

Ravi Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Sunil Vs State of Haryana and Another

Saroj Vs Chief Administrator and Anr.

Som Parkash Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Santosh Devi Vs State of Haryana and Ors.