Dismissed
Sunil v. State of Haryana and Another
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/13371/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
207+103 CWP No.13371 of 2019(O&M) Date of decision: 06.01.2023
SUNIL
...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Present: Mr. S.S. Nain, Advocate for Mr. Pradeep Chhoker, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana.
RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)
In view of the reply filed by the respondent No.2, it has been stated that as per record of re-examination of the documents submitted by the petitioner at the time of scrutiny, it has been found that the petitioner has submitted the undertaking and is found entitled for 5 marks for socio economic criteria. The candidature of the petitioner has been recommended by the Commission for his appointment to the post of male constable.
As per stand taken by the respondent No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been appointed to the post of constable and is entitled for all
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.06 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
CWP No.13371 of 2019(O&M)
-2-
necessary benefits which have been granted to similarly situated candidates as there was no fault of the petitioner in depriving him of the appointment at the relevant time.
This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take all corrective steps in treating the petitioner at par with other similarly situated candidates who have been appointed to the post/cadre.
06.01.2023 P.Bhatt
(RAJ MOHAN SINGH) JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Whether reportable?
Yes/No Yes/No
POONAM BHATT 2023.01.06 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to corrective steps to be treated par with similarly situated candidates appointed to the post of male constable.
Sunil
State of Haryana
Another
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court