Dismissed

Ravi v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jan 2023CWP/12054/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition filed by Ravi challenging his non-selection for the post of Constable (Male)(IRB). The Court disposed of the matter based on a 2021 letter recommending the petitioner's appointment following re-examination in compliance with a previous judgment.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with normal consequences to follow.

Ravi Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

206

¶3

CWP No.12054 of 2019 Date of decision: 06.01.2023

RAVI

...Petitioner

Versus

HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

¶8

...Respondent

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

¶10

Present: None for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, DAG, Haryana.

¶12

¶13

RAJ MOHAN SINGH , J.(ORAL)

¶14

Petitioner has preferred the present writ petition for issuance of a writ especially in the nature of certiorari quashing the final result dated 03.03.2019 to the extent of non-selection of the petitioner on the post of Constable (Male)(IRB).

¶15

The petitioner has pleaded that he has secured marks more than the last selected candidate in his category. Further writ in the nature of mandamus is also sought for directing the respondent to grant 5 additional marks for socio economic criteria as no one from the family of the petitioner is in government job.

¶16

Learned State counsel has produced on record letter dated 25.07.2021 in the context of recommendation made by the Competent Authority for the selection of the petitioner on the

¶17

POONAM BHATT 2023.01.06 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

¶18

CWP No.12054 of 2019

¶19

-2-

¶20

basis of re-scrutiny/re-examination of the documents of the petitioner and on the basis of written marks secured by the petitioner.

¶21

According to the aforesaid letter, in compliance of the order passed by the High Court in CWP No.5221 of 2019 titled Vikas Harsana vs. State of Haryana and others, the Commission has re-examined the documents of the petitioner along with others in respect of eligibility, marks for socio economic criteria and qualification for the post of Male Constable in pursuance of advertisement No.3/2018 Category No.3. On re-examination of the petitioner's document and on the basis of marks secured by him, the candidature of the petitioner has been recommended as he falls under selection zone and therefore he has been recommended for appointment to the aforesaid post. The appointment shall be subject to medical examination and other verifications.

¶22

The letter dated 25.07.2021 is taken on record.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid factual position of the case, this writ petition is disposed of. Normal consequences to follow.

¶24

06.01.2023 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH) P.Bhatt JUDGE

¶25

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶26

POONAM BHATT 2023.01.06 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this Judicial Record/Decree/Document, which is scanned copy of the original

Ravi v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramlal Vs State of Haryana and Others

M/S Raman Industries Vs Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. Chandigarh & Ors.

Sanjay Pannu Vs State of Haryana and Others

Satinder Pal Singh Vs the State Transport Commissioner Punjab and Another

Sunil Vs State of Haryana and Another

Bal Krishan Saini Vs Regional Transport Authority Jalandhar through Its Secretary