Disposed

Razak Mohammad and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Oct 2023CWP/23694/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the Respondent State to expeditiously consider a legal notice seeking equalization of enlistment dates for petitioners, citing a prior ratio regarding constables.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.2 to consider the legal notice dated 6.6.2023 expeditiously, preferably within 6 months, bearing mind the ratio of Sukhmander Singh case.

Razak Mohammad and Others Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2023)

¶1

2023:PHHC:135657

¶2

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶3

CWP-23694-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.10.2023

¶4

Razak Mohammad and others ….Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶6

Present:Ms. Komal Thakur, Advocate for Mr. K.K. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶7

¶8

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶9

The petitioners herein seek that their date of enlistment as Constables be brought at par with the date when SPOs junior to the petitioners were enlisted as Constables on out of turn basis. The petitioners also pray for grant of other consequential benefits.

¶10

It has been submitted that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by a judgment dated 16.3.2023 passed by this Court in CWP-5648-2017 titled as Sukhmander Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others (Annexure P4) .

¶11

Notice of motion.

¶12

On asking of the Court, Mr. Inderpreet Singh Kang, AAG, Punjab, upon whom an advance copy of petition had already been served, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

¶13

Learned State counsel submits that the case of the petitioners shall be considered in accordance with law and since they have already sent a legal

¶14

Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.19 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶15

CWP-23694-2023 (O&M)

¶16

( 2 )

¶17

2023:PHHC:135657

¶18

notice dated 6.6.2023 (Annexure P-5) and the same has not been decided, some direction may be issued at this stage for expeditious disposal of the legal notice.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – The Director General of Police, Punjab Police Headquarter, Sector – 9, Chandigarh to consider the legal notice dated 6.6.2023 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law while bearing in mind the ratio of Sukhmander Singh’s case (supra) and to dispose of the same expeditiously preferably within a period of 6 months from today.

¶20

A copy of this order along with copy of legal notice dated 6.6.2023 (Annexure P-5) be sent to respondent No.2 – The Director General of Police, Punjab Police Headquarter, Sector – 9, Chandigarh for necessary compliance.

¶21

18.10.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No

¶22

Pankaj Kakkar 2023.10.19 12:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Razak Mohammad and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Razak Mohammad and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Saini Vs State of Haryana and Others

Niharika Gupta Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Manvinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Vakil Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sulekh Chand Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Amandeep Saini Vs State of Punjab and Others