The High Court allowed the petitioner, lacking locus standi as a private individual not being a victim or complainant, to assist the State in the main appeal despite conceding the delay was condoned and disposing of the revision petition on grounds of lack of standing.
Permission to assist the State in an appeal; revision petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:152946
210
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-567-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.12.2023
Dharambir
...Pe##oner
Versus
State of Haryana and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate for the pe##oner.
Ms. Shubhra Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) CRM-5462-2018
For the reasons men#oned in the applica#on, delay of 255 days in filing the present pe##on is condoned.
Applica#on stands disposed of.
Main case
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Sta#on | Sec#ons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 02.08.2013 | SVB Rohtak | 7, 8, 13 of PC Act, 1988 |
(ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
01.12.2023 Jyo# Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
Jyoti Sharma 2023.12.02 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner who is neither victim nor complainant and lacks locus standi should be permitted to assist the State in an appeal filed by the accused-convict.
Dharambir
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
