The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petitioner's petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC, making the interim order absolute as the investigation no longer required custodial interrogation.
Interim order dated 15.11.2023 made absolute; all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2023:PHHC:151513
CRM-M-57518-2023
212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-57518-2023
Decided on: 29.11.2023
Bhupender Singh Verma ...Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Vinod Ghai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate and Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. AG, Haryana.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| 255 | 28.05.2020 | Faridabad Central, | 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120- |
| Faridabad | B IPC and 7, 13(1)(d) of | ||
| Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 |
ANJU RANI 2023.12.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1
2
CRM-M-57518-2023
2023:PHHC:151513
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 29.11.2023 anju rani Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
ANJU RANI 2023.12.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail order should be made absolute given the petitioner's voluntary compliance and release on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhupender Singh Verma
State of Haryana
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
