The High Court entertained an instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding regular bail in an NDPS Act case. Upon the petitioner's counsel moving for withdrawal of the petition, the court allowed the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the instant bail petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������� �������������������������������������
�������������
242
CRM-M-61195-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.12.2023
Harmeet Singh Alias Neeta
....Petitioner
���� ��
State of Punjab
...Respondent
����!�����"�#��!�$���%������!������������
�&&&&&
Present : Mr. A.S. Brar, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG Punjab
&&&&&
�!������������$��$
1 . The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.38 dated 12.03.2023, registered under Section 22 of NDPS Act, at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga.
2 . As per custody certificate filed by learned State counsel, the petitioner is behind bars for only 9 months and 2 days, commercial quantity of contraband has been recovered from him and he is involved in 1 more case under the NDPS Act.
3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage.
4 . Ordered accordingly.
��'�!������������(�
�����������
��$��$���� M.Kamra
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
MOHIT 2023.12.13 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C to the petitioner in an NDPS Act case at which the counsel moved for withdrawal of the petition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Harmeet Singh Alias Neeta
State of Punjab
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
