The High Court dismissed a bail petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as requested by the counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner sought regular bail in an FIR involving offenses under Sections 387 and 506 IPC.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:158505
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
240
CRM-M-54249-2023
Date of decision: 11.12.2023
Sadik Anwar
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. AG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.
2 . Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is behind bars for 01 year, 04 month and 02 days. He is involved in 6 other cases with similar allegations and is not on bail in any of the cases.
3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage.
4 . Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
11.12.2023 Ankur
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Ankur Goyal 2023.12.12 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. shall be disposed of when the petitioner requests withdrawal of the petition.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Sadik Anwar
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
