Petitioner withdrew a criminal miscellaneous petition due to clerical omission regarding criminal history, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition after disclosure. All pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:144525
218
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 53097 of 2021 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 14.11.2023
Harjit Singh
-Pe&&oner
Versus
State of Punjab
-Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Mohit Sadana, Advocate, for the pe&&oner.
Mr. Shiva Khurmi, A.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
State counsel objects to the maintainability of the present pe&&on on the ground that criminal history has not been men&oned.
At this, counsel for the pe&&oner submits that due to some miscommunica&on, this error has occurred and he seeks withdrawal of the present pe&&on with liberty to file fresh one a8er disclosing the criminal antecedent of the pe&&oner.
Given above, present pe&&on stand disposed of as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
All pending applica&ons also stands disposed of.
14.11.2023 (ANOOP CHITKARA) Jyo" Sharma JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Jyoti Sharma 2023.11.15 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh
Harjit Singh
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
