The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal by the complainant for non-prosecution, noting his non-appearance before the Bench on multiple occasions.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:141563
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
214 CRA-S-430-SB-2015
Date of Decision: 07.11.2023
Manoj Kumar ......... Pe��oner
Versus
Ravinder Kumar and another ......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present None for the appellant.
Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G. Haryana (Through video conferencing).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
that the appellant (complainant), who had filed the present appeal challenging the acqui6al of accused-respondent is not appearing before this Court.
appellant due to his non-appearance. As per report of Registry, appellant stands served but none has appeared on his behalf.
stand disposed of.
07.11.2023 Jyo�-II
| (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
JYOTI 2023.11.15 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Manoj Kumar
Ravinder Kumar
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
