The High Court dismissed a revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner had failed to appear on multiple dates despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
317
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-80-2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.03.2023
Renu ... Petitioner(s) Versus Ravinder & Ors. ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
On 09.08.2022 none had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Even on 14.12.2022 none had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present revision petition for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( ALKA SARIN ) 01.03.2023 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.02 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Renu
Ravinder
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
