Revision petition challenging dismissal of a suit for permanent injunction was dismissed because the petitioner did not wish to press it. The court noted the Wakf Board had licensed the disputed land to the petitioner.
None; revision petition dismissed for want of pressing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
756+119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2624-2009 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.03.2023
Arjan Singh ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala and Ors. ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Amandeep Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Nand Lal Sammi, Advocate and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
The plaintiff-petitioner herein had filed a suit against the Wakf Board and others for permanent injunction restraining the defendants therein from disturbing the peaceful possession of the plaintiff-petitioner over the suit property. The said suit was dismissed vide order dated 25.02.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition has been filed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1-Punjab Wakf Board has handed over a letter dated 22.02.2023 issued by the Punjab Wakf Board, Jalandhar stating therein as under :
“To
The Chief Executive Officer, Punjab Waqf Board, Chandigarh.
Sub: Intimation regarding case titled Arjan Singh Vs. Punjab Waqf Board.
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.02 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CR-2624-2009 (O&M)
-2-
Sir,
It is submitted that the Punjab Waqf Board has licenced out the waqf land attached to Khangah/Graveyard comprised in Kh. No.288 area measuring 1 Kanal 15 marla out of 1K-15M. situated at Basti Mithu, Jalandhar in favour of Shri Arjan Singh S/o Sh. Mangal Singh R/o H. No. 728, Basti Mithu, Jalandhar for the year 2022-23 to 2024-25 vide Lease Order No.24/L-U/1696/22/234 dated 30.1.2023. He has paid the licence fee to the Board upto the year 2024-25.
This is for your kind information and further necessary action please.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner states that she does not wish to press the present revision petition. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 01.03.2023 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.02 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Arjan Singh
Punjab Wakf Board, Ambala
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
