Petitioner sought a writ petition. The High Court dismissed it as rendered infructuous, disposing of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
756-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-915-2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 01.03.2023
Arjan Singh ... Petitioner(s) Versus Balbir Singh @ Ballu ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Ms. Amandeep Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Nand Lal Sammi, Advocate and Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Advocate for the respondent.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present
petition has since been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN ) 01.03.2023 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.02 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Arjan Singh
Balbir Singh @ Ballu
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
