A revision petition challenging a final order in a civil suit was dismissed as infructuous since the principal suit had already been finally decided by the trial court.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral citation No. 2023:PHHC:064370
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 4428 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.5.2023
Bhupinder Kaur ................Petitioner
vs. Chunni Lal and others .................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr Anil K. Sokal, Advocate for Mr. Lokesh Narang, Senior Govt. Panel counsel for respondent No. 2
H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)
Mr Anil K. Sokal, Advocate for Mr. Lokesh Narang, Senior Govt. Panel counsel has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2.
Respondents No. 1, 3 and 4 are report to have been duly served. But they have not turned up. They are proceeded against ex parte.
As per copy of the judgment downloaded by staff of this Court from the official website, the main suit has been finally decided by the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Phillaur, on 23.9.2019.
The revision petition is directed against an order passed in the said civil suit. With the final disposal of the civil suit, this revision petition has become infructuous and is dismissed accordingly.
4.5.2023
( H.S. Madaan ) Judge
chugh
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No
BANITA CHUGH 2023.05.04 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Bhupinder Kaur
Chunni Lal
H. S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
