Court dismissed a revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite two hearings, indicating lack of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:042268
249+102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-184-2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.03.2023
Ajay Porus ... Petitioner(s) Versus Amita Porus & Ors . ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
None had put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 01.12.2022. Today the matter has been called twice. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present revision petition for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
22.03.2023 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.23 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Ajay Porus
Amita Porus & Ors.
Alka Sarin
Yogesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
