No.Dismissal due to non-prosecution in a 2011 revision petition.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:PHHC:042281
R-813
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4493-2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.03.2023
Rakesh Prashar ... Petitioner(s) Versus Gurbax Singh ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
The present revision petition pertains to the year 2011. On 13.02.2023 none had put in appearance on behalf of the parties. Today again, none has put in appearance on behalf of the parties. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
22.03.2023 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2023.03.23 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Rakesh Prashar
Gurbax Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
