Note: The text provided is an administrative order listing the bench and referring parties to a separate detailed order (RFA No. 1546 of 2021). No substantive facts, legal reasoning, or operative decision regarding the appeal before this court is present in the excerpt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.1987 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.03.2022
State of Haryana
..Appellant (s)
Versus
Ramesh Chand Bansal and another
..Respondent (s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present����������������������������������� and Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate, Mr. M.K. Chouhan, Advocate, Mr. Rayhan Khan, Advocate, Mr. Abhay Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Vishal Bhateja, Advocate, Mr. Jashan Singh Sekhon, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Sindhu, Advocate, Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate, Mr. Narender Singh Kamboj, Advocate, Mr. Dinesh Singh, Advocate, Mr. Pavinder Singh Bedi, Advocate, Mr. O.P. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate, Mr. Parmod Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate, Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for the landowners. ***
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral)
For orders, see detailed order of the even date passed in RFA
No.1546 of 2021 , titled as State of Haryana and another vs. Rajinder Singh.
11.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) ashok JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2022.04.04 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
State of Haryana
Ramesh Chand Bansal
another
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
